{"id":"ARG-012","name":"Separate premise from conclusion","domain":"argument","layer":"paragraph","strength":"hard_constraint","human_logic":"IF the conclusion is presented as a premise OR circularly restates it, THEN add independent support or acknowledge assumption ELSE retain.","when":{"any":[{"path":"argument.circularity","operator":"eq","value":true},{"path":"argument.conclusion_used_as_premise","operator":"eq","value":true}]},"then":[{"action":"repair","target":"argument","options":["add_independent_premise","mark_assumption","withdraw_conclusion"]}],"else":[{"action":"retain","target":"current_text","reason":"No triggering condition is present."}],"unless":[],"because":"A conclusion cannot gain support solely by being restated.","diagnostics":[],"examples":{},"source_ids":["WEB-010","BK-026"],"laka":{"smallest_sufficient_intervention":true,"primary_axes":["scope","depth","magnitude","reversibility"]},"requires_facts":["argument.circularity","argument.conclusion_used_as_premise"],"tests":[],"sources":[{"id":"WEB-010","title":"Rhetorical Situations","creator":"Purdue Online Writing Lab","domain":"rhetoric","type":"University writing resource","note":"Author, audience, purpose, text, and setting as communication constraints.","url":"https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/rhetorical_situation/index.html"},{"id":"BK-026","title":"Technical Communication","creator":"Mike Markel; Stuart A. Selber","domain":"technical_communication","type":"Book","note":"Audience, design, ethics, research, and technical genres.","url":null}],"defined_in":{"file":"14-argument-nonfiction-rules.json","title":"Argument and Nonfiction Reasoning Rules","slug":"argument-nonfiction-rules"}}