Writing Quality Measurement Model

{
  "title": "Writing Quality Measurement Model",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "metrics": [
    {
      "id": "accuracy",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Does every proposition preserve intended and supportable meaning?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "grammar",
      "weight": 1,
      "question": "Are required morphological and syntactic relations well formed for the target variety?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "clarity",
      "weight": 1.5,
      "question": "Can the audience recover referents, relations, scope, and action without preventable rereading?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "usability",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Can the reader find, understand, and use the content for the intended task?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "structure",
      "weight": 1,
      "question": "Does order reveal the document’s questions, hierarchy, and progression?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "evidence",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Do claims have appropriate, proximate, bounded support?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "accessibility",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Can readers with varied sensory, cognitive, language, and input conditions access the meaning and action?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "voice_fit",
      "weight": 0.75,
      "question": "Does the prose maintain the declared relationship and adapt tone to the situation?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "rhythm",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "question": "Do syntax, length, sound, stress, and repetition support attention and effect?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "ethics",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Does the text preserve truth, dignity, consent, privacy, and meaningful choice?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "maintainability",
      "weight": 0.75,
      "question": "Can volatile facts, terms, rules, and versions be updated without drift?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "outcome",
      "weight": 2,
      "question": "Did the intended reader state or behavior change as intended without unacceptable harm?",
      "score_range": [
        0,
        4
      ]
    }
  ],
  "formula": "weighted_score = sum(metric_score × weight) / sum(4 × weight) × 100",
  "score_meanings": {
    "0": "absent_or_harmful",
    "1": "major_failure",
    "2": "usable_with_material_limits",
    "3": "strong",
    "4": "excellent_for_context"
  },
  "hard_gates": {
    "if": {
      "any": [
        {
          "path": "accuracy",
          "operator": "lt",
          "value": 2
        },
        {
          "path": "evidence",
          "operator": "lt",
          "value": 2
        },
        {
          "path": "accessibility",
          "operator": "lt",
          "value": 2
        },
        {
          "path": "ethics",
          "operator": "lt",
          "value": 2
        }
      ]
    },
    "then": "fail_regardless_of_average",
    "else": "calculate_weighted_score"
  },
  "outcome_tests": [
    "comprehension_recall",
    "findability_time",
    "task_completion",
    "error_rate",
    "decision_quality",
    "qualified_conversion",
    "retention_or_follow_through",
    "reader_trust",
    "maintenance_drift"
  ]
}