Bow Tie Kreative Writing System

Rules / argument

ARG-001 Hard constraint layer: document

Define the rhetorical situation

IF author, audience, purpose, text, or setting is unknown, THEN define the missing element before drafting strategy ELSE proceed.

Why the rule exists

Arguments work inside situations, not in a vacuum.

Condition

The rule fires when this evaluates true. Paths marked below must be present in the fact base; the engine reports the rest rather than guessing them.

  • ANY
    • context.author missing true
    • context.audience missing true
    • context.purpose missing true
    • context.channel missing true
    • context.setting missing true

Facts this rule reads

Fact paths read by ARG-001 and whether the analyser derives them
PathSource
context.author You supply it
context.audience You supply it
context.purpose You supply it
context.channel You supply it
context.setting You supply it

Then

  1. request_context — target rhetorical_situation

Else

  1. retain — target current_text, No triggering condition is present.

LAKA

Smallest sufficient intervention
Yes
Primary axes

Sources

  • Rhetorical Situations — Purdue Online Writing Lab link
    Author, audience, purpose, text, and setting as communication constraints.
  • Technical Communication — Mike Markel; Stuart A. Selber
    Audience, design, ethics, research, and technical genres.
The raw rule record

Verbatim from 14-argument-nonfiction-rules.json. Also available at /v1/rules/ARG-001.

{
  "id": "ARG-001",
  "name": "Define the rhetorical situation",
  "domain": "argument",
  "layer": "document",
  "strength": "hard_constraint",
  "human_logic": "IF author, audience, purpose, text, or setting is unknown, THEN define the missing element before drafting strategy ELSE proceed.",
  "when": {
    "any": [
      {
        "path": "context.author",
        "operator": "missing",
        "value": true
      },
      {
        "path": "context.audience",
        "operator": "missing",
        "value": true
      },
      {
        "path": "context.purpose",
        "operator": "missing",
        "value": true
      },
      {
        "path": "context.channel",
        "operator": "missing",
        "value": true
      },
      {
        "path": "context.setting",
        "operator": "missing",
        "value": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "then": [
    {
      "action": "request_context",
      "target": "rhetorical_situation",
      "fields": [
        "author",
        "audience",
        "purpose",
        "text",
        "setting"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "else": [
    {
      "action": "retain",
      "target": "current_text",
      "reason": "No triggering condition is present."
    }
  ],
  "unless": [],
  "because": "Arguments work inside situations, not in a vacuum.",
  "diagnostics": [],
  "examples": {},
  "source_ids": [
    "WEB-010",
    "BK-026"
  ],
  "laka": {
    "smallest_sufficient_intervention": true,
    "primary_axes": [
      "scope",
      "depth",
      "magnitude",
      "reversibility"
    ]
  }
}

Other argument rules

  1. ARG-002 One controlling thesis IF a document makes multiple unrelated controlling claims, THEN narrow, subordinate, or split them ELSE retain. Context default
  2. ARG-003 Classify claim before selecting evidence IF a claim is present, THEN classify it as factual, causal, evaluative, definitional, predictive, or policy before choosing support ELSE do not infer support requirements. Hard constraint
  3. ARG-004 Evidence matches claim type IF evidence type does not support the claim type, THEN replace, supplement, narrow, or remove the claim ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  4. ARG-005 Make the warrant available IF evidence does not obviously entail the claim for the intended audience, THEN state the connecting warrant ELSE retain. Context default
  5. ARG-006 Qualify to the evidence boundary IF claim scope exceeds evidence population, conditions, time, or uncertainty, THEN narrow or qualify the claim ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  6. ARG-007 Address strongest relevant counterargument IF a reasonable reader has a strong relevant objection, THEN represent it fairly and respond with evidence or concession ELSE omit peripheral objections. Context default
  7. ARG-008 Distinguish correlation from causation IF evidence is correlational AND the claim is causal, THEN add causal evidence, state a mechanism with tests, or change the claim to association ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  8. ARG-009 Name uncertainty and limitations IF evidence has material uncertainty, missing data, selection limits, or alternative explanations, THEN disclose them near the conclusion ELSE retain. Hard constraint