Bow Tie Kreative Writing System
Run the engine

Rules / argument

ARG-007 Context default layer: section

Address strongest relevant counterargument

IF a reasonable reader has a strong relevant objection, THEN represent it fairly and respond with evidence or concession ELSE omit peripheral objections.

Why the rule exists

A fair response improves both reasoning and credibility.

Condition

The rule fires when this evaluates true. Paths marked below must be present in the fact base; the engine reports the rest rather than guessing them.

  • ALL
    • argument.counterargument.strength eq "strong"
    • argument.counterargument.relevance eq "high"

Facts this rule reads

PathSource
argument.counterargument.strength You supply it
argument.counterargument.relevance You supply it

Then

  1. insert — target argument.counterargument
  2. respond — target argument.counterargument

Else

  1. retain — target current_text, No triggering condition is present.

LAKA

Smallest sufficient intervention
Yes
Primary axes

Sources

  • Technical Communication — Mike Markel; Stuart A. Selber
    Audience, design, ethics, research, and technical genres.
  • Rhetorical Situations — Purdue Online Writing Lab link
    Author, audience, purpose, text, and setting as communication constraints.
The raw rule record

Verbatim from 14-argument-nonfiction-rules.json. Also available at /v1/rules/ARG-007.

{
  "id": "ARG-007",
  "name": "Address strongest relevant counterargument",
  "domain": "argument",
  "layer": "section",
  "strength": "context_default",
  "human_logic": "IF a reasonable reader has a strong relevant objection, THEN represent it fairly and respond with evidence or concession ELSE omit peripheral objections.",
  "when": {
    "all": [
      {
        "path": "argument.counterargument.strength",
        "operator": "eq",
        "value": "strong"
      },
      {
        "path": "argument.counterargument.relevance",
        "operator": "eq",
        "value": "high"
      }
    ]
  },
  "then": [
    {
      "action": "insert",
      "target": "argument.counterargument",
      "representation": "fair"
    },
    {
      "action": "respond",
      "target": "argument.counterargument",
      "options": [
        "rebut",
        "concede",
        "limit_claim",
        "integrate"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "else": [
    {
      "action": "retain",
      "target": "current_text",
      "reason": "No triggering condition is present."
    }
  ],
  "unless": [],
  "because": "A fair response improves both reasoning and credibility.",
  "diagnostics": [],
  "examples": {},
  "source_ids": [
    "BK-026",
    "WEB-010"
  ],
  "laka": {
    "smallest_sufficient_intervention": true,
    "primary_axes": [
      "scope",
      "depth",
      "magnitude",
      "reversibility"
    ]
  }
}

Other argument rules

  1. ARG-001 Define the rhetorical situation IF author, audience, purpose, text, or setting is unknown, THEN define the missing element before drafting strategy ELSE proceed. Hard constraint
  2. ARG-002 One controlling thesis IF a document makes multiple unrelated controlling claims, THEN narrow, subordinate, or split them ELSE retain. Context default
  3. ARG-003 Classify claim before selecting evidence IF a claim is present, THEN classify it as factual, causal, evaluative, definitional, predictive, or policy before choosing support ELSE do not infer support requirements. Hard constraint
  4. ARG-004 Evidence matches claim type IF evidence type does not support the claim type, THEN replace, supplement, narrow, or remove the claim ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  5. ARG-005 Make the warrant available IF evidence does not obviously entail the claim for the intended audience, THEN state the connecting warrant ELSE retain. Context default
  6. ARG-006 Qualify to the evidence boundary IF claim scope exceeds evidence population, conditions, time, or uncertainty, THEN narrow or qualify the claim ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  7. ARG-008 Distinguish correlation from causation IF evidence is correlational AND the claim is causal, THEN add causal evidence, state a mechanism with tests, or change the claim to association ELSE retain. Hard constraint
  8. ARG-009 Name uncertainty and limitations IF evidence has material uncertainty, missing data, selection limits, or alternative explanations, THEN disclose them near the conclusion ELSE retain. Hard constraint